Emulating Hong Kong would best suit China
By Paul Lin 林保華 Taipei Times 2012.11.10
The appearance of so-called “dragon and lion”
flags, derived from the one used when Hong Kong was
a British colony, on protest marches has provoked an
angry reaction from a retired official of the Hong
Kong and Macao Affairs Office (HMO) of China’s
State Council.
The incident came to a head when the South China
Morning Post received an e-mail from former HMO
director Lu Ping (魯平), in which he said that Hong
Kongers who did not think of themselves as Chinese
should consider renouncing their Chinese
citizenship. Lu said that China has a population of
1.3 billion, so would not mind losing such a tiny
handful of people.
Five years ago a Chinese Web site’s opinion poll
showed 65 percent of respondents saying that they
would not want to be reincarnated as Chinese. Now Lu
has permited Hong Kongers not to be Chinese anymore
in this life.
Some Hong Kongers are glad to hear this, and have
embarrassed the authorities by calling on them to
set up special desks for them to renounce their
Chinese citizenship. Rita Fan (范徐麗泰), a delegate
to China’s National People’s Congress, interceded
by saying that some officials’ reactions may have
been excessive and that she hoped that Hong Kongers
would not react angrily.
Lu is 85 years old. His retirement in 1997 was a
loss for China. It would have been better if he had
gone on to serve as general secretary of the Chinese
Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee and
president of China. Considering his enlightened
attitude of agreeing that Hong Kongers could
renounce Chinese citizenship, I would be willing to
kowtow to Lu, because from that point on Taiwan
would also be able to move toward becoming a normal,
sovereign democratic country.
CCP sympathizers in Hong Kong have recently attacked
its judicial independence, even calling for Hong
Kong’s judiciary to submit to the central
authorities.
Kemal Bokhary, used his retirement from being one of
the three permanent judges of Hong Kong’s Court of
Final Appeal to warn of the approach of “a storm of
unprecedented ferocity.”
An editorial in Tuesday’s Chinese-language Hong
Kong daily Ming Pao (明報) said some Chinese
jurisprudence experts suggest reorganizing the Court
of Final Appeal and the Basic Law Promotion Steering
Committee and tearing up the Sino-British Joint
Declaration by demanding that all Court of Final
Appeal judges must be Chinese citizens.
Being all too familiar with the Chinese way of doing
things, even the thoroughly pro-unification Ming Pao
had to comment that “if the storm that Bokhary
talked about is already looming, the task of
upholding Hong Kong’s core values will enter a new
stage.”
This shows how vital a civilized judiciary is for
Hong Kong.
The CCP sees the Opium Wars as a humiliation for
China, but some Chinese question the way the wars
have been denigrated by their opium connection. If
the wars had not pushed open China’s gates, they
say, there would have been no Self-Strengthening
Movement, with its acceptance of Western
civilization. One result of the Boxer Rebellion was
that five southeastern provinces of China, plus the
eastern province of Shandong, ignored orders to take
up arms against the invaders, leaving the Qing
Dynasty to its fate. These provinces came to be
China’s most open-minded and economically developed
areas.
Chinese culture can explain only the past, not the
present. The best thing for Chinese would be for all
of China to become like Hong Kong. Unfortunately the
CCP’s opposition to Westernization, especially
since the 1989 democracy movement, has caused human
rights to retreat and corruption to flourish. If
China really wants to reform, it must accept the
civilized values of the West. If it does not, all
talk of reform is meaningless.
By Paul Lin 林保華
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
留言列表